I built a dedicated virtual machine lab to study memory safety issues. I created a small vulnerable program, observed stack behavior, and crafted a proof-of-concept that demonstrated control flow redirection. I then applied mitigations and verified they blocked the technique.
(How to Develop & Test Exploits)
Safely reproduce a simple buffer overflow in a lab
Observe function frames, input length, and return address behavior
Demonstrate control redirection with a benign payload
Recompile with protections and confirm mitigation
Virtualization host and a Linux virtual machine
Familiarity with C and Python
Comfort with debugging and disassembly fundamentals
VirtualBox or similar hypervisor
GCC and a debugger such as GDB
Scripting for payload construction
1. Lab setup
Provisioned a Linux virtual machine with compiler and debugger tools.
Snapshotted the virtual machine to allow quick rollback.
2. Vulnerable sample
Wrote a minimal C program with an unchecked copy into a fixed buffer for teaching purposes.
Compiled first without hardening to observe the issue in a safe setting.
3. Analysis
Used debugger and disassembly to inspect the call stack and offsets.
Calculated input size required to overwrite the saved return address.
4. Proof of concept
Composed a payload that proved control redirection with a harmless effect in the lab.
Verified impact only within the virtual machine and documented observations.
5. Mitigation
Recompiled with stack protection and non-executable stack.
Re-ran the proof of concept to confirm the mitigation blocked execution.
Documented secure coding practices and safer library calls.
Clear, reproducible demonstration of why bounds checking matters
Practical understanding of compiler and operating system protections
Evidence that mitigations prevent the attack in this scenario
Vulnerability research in a contained environment
Reverse engineering fundamentals and debugging
Secure coding and mitigation verification